Happy St Nick’s Day


St Nick slapping MartinSJ.jpg

Posted in Saints | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Celebrating Fatima?

Image result for miricle of the sun

Today is the 100 year anniversary of the miracle of the sun at Fatima. This event, witnessed by thousands including hostile skeptics is seen as validation of the apparitions. About a year ago, maybe less, I received a packet in the mail from the local Catholic radio station. Labeled “celebrating Fatima” it contained a commemorative keychain and some other devotional items of the syrupy sentimental sort. This is entirely wrong headed. Just as effeminate spirituality has transferred Jesus from the dread judge of the living, dead and world by fire to a soft inoffensive nice guy; it has transferred Our Lady of Fatima to an object of sentimentality.

Devotion to Fatima has largely been successfully reduced to images of the Lady and three shepherd children. Fatima was a warning. To put it in my own words “pray the Rosary, do penance, make sacrifices, consecrate Russia otherwise the errors of Russia will spread and really bad stuff will happen”. This is serious business and a warning to be headed not celebrated.

These warnings have largely not been headed in my opinion. The errors of Russia is usually interpreted as communism. “But we won the cold war” some will object. Ah, but did we? Contemporary western culture is dominated by postmodernism, which as Dr. Jordan Peterson explains is Marxism. Other errors of Russia, daughters of Marx, which many are unaware of, are it’s sexual revolution. Widespread pornography, abortion, easy divorce/temporary marriage, normalized perversion and huge numbers of abandoned children wandering the streets. The resultant social problems in the USSR became so great that the communist party had to completely reverse its policy on sexual “liberation”. Sound familiar?

So those of us who believe in the apparition of Fatima aught to heed it, albeit imperfectly, by praying and making sacrifices. We should also oppose the watering down of the message into a sentimental attachment to the image of OL Fatima. Taken in conjunction with the vision of Pope Leo XIII we might hope, assuming that it was the 20th century which was given to Satan, that the triumph of the Immaculate Heart is coming soon.

Posted in Mary | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Protestant Mythology #2

Myth #1


Recently I was at my parents’ house and paged through the KJV family Bible. In this particular volume, rather than printing the Apocrypha between the testaments as it should be, the editors put supplementary material there. Essays on the inter-testamental period, touching on the Apocrypha, as well as a history of English Bibles. I was struck by a number of inaccuracy’s some of which come off as outright lies. I have decided to lay out a number of these myths with more historical detail in hopes of balancing them.

The mythology- is a cohesive narrative which goes something like this. “The evil Roman Church intentionally kept man in darkness and ignorance during the middle ages. The Roman Church suppressed the Bible by only allowing it in a corrupt Latin version which no one could understand. Additionally these Latin Bibles were physically chained to lecterns in churches so they couldn’t be read.
Additionally the Church killed anyone who tried to make the Bible accessible to people. When they could no longer keep the Bible from people they then added books to it to justify their unbiblical doctrines.”

The mythology is set up such so as to have clear good guys and bad guys. This set up, generalizes in such a way as to ignore the nuances of historical realities. This distorts an accurate understanding of the history of both the protestant reformation and the origin of translations of the Bible into English. What I’m going to do is lay out a number of myths which are typically presented as historical details.

  • “The Latin Vulgate was a horribly corrupt version of the Bible which should be rejected out of hand.” Fact- All the translations being lauded by the myth-holder for replacing the Vulgate (Luther’s German Bible, Wycliffe, Coverdale, Geneva and, oh yes though often denied, the Authorized Version). Relied heavily on the Vulgate and in most cases used it as the primary base text. Consult any standard (Oxford or Cambridge) King James Version New Testament and you will find ample evidence of the Vulgate influence, (most readily this can be seen in the form of Latinized spelling, Esaias for Isaiah, for example). Modern translators consult it also, as a valuable witness to manuscripts no longer available.
  •  “The Church kept the Scriptures in Latin to keep them from people.” Fact- Anyone in this period who could read could also understand Latin. Latin was the universal language of western Europe prior to the modern era, understood by all educated people.
  • “The Bibles that did exist were chained to keep them from people.” Fact- Prior to the printing press Bibles had to be hand copied over the course of years. Public Bibles (and other books) were chained to lecterns for the same reason banks chain pens in their teller areas today, to keep them from growing legs and walking off. Protestants themselves did this but modern evangelicals have little historical awareness, it seems the mythologists just can’t resist this one.
  • “Erasmus produced his Greek/Latin new testament to expose the Roman Church and her twisted Vulgate by exposing the errors in the Vulgate.” Fact.- Erasmus desired to produce a new improved Latin New Testament. He publishes a number of editions containing the Greek text, with his text and the Vulgate text for comparison. Many protestants like to make him one of their own but he lived and died a Papist, kept his distance from Luther and (as a humanist) militantly believed in free will. To be opposed to corruption in an institution and in favor of reform does not equate to protesting the thing itself.

I think this addresses the general myth. A perusal of any Evangelical or Fundamentalist account of the history of the English bible (they are out there, museums, films or essays) will be some version of what I covered along with the false facts.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Have a Manly Lent


It’s time for my annual Lenten pep talk. I’ve reshaped these same ideas the last few years and presented them differently. This year I’m going to speak as a man to men. Ladies, feel free to draw inspiration. (I’m not exactly leaving the women out, it’s just that this other way of speaking is how I’m presenting these ideas this year.)

Ok, obligatory, cautionary warning! We are talking about a spiritual workout. Just as you need to ease your way into physical exercise so as not to injure yourself. You also need to establish the basics and ease into the routine of spiritual exercise. We are in pre-lent right now, this past Sunday was Sexagesima Sunday which is 60ish days before Easter. Now is the perfect time to establish good form and a foundation for your spiritual exercises before increasing the intensity. You can do some mini fasts on Wednesday and Friday in preparation for a fuller Lenten fast, for example.

Ok, what sort of spiritual practices should we be planning on for Lent? The 3 traditional practices are prayer, fasting, and almsgiving. To this we can add spiritual reading as well. Let’s examine these in greater detail.

    1. Prayer; How can you increase or intensify your daily prayer life? What does it currently look like? Do you pray the Rosary daily? Do you attend or privately pray any of the Divine Office? Do you pray with your family? Are there any obstacles in your prayer life, and what are you able to do about them? Do you go to confession? How often do you examine your conscience? Do you read the bible and spiritual writings? What can you change? Suggestion- audio books/ sermons can be fit in on the go.
    2. Fasting; Frankly the current fasting practice of most Catholics is embarrassing. Take a look at the fasting regulations from before 1960 (can be seen on the image below) or of the Eastern Orthodox Church. Now taking one’s health conditions into account, challenge yourself! If you are reasonably healthy you can follow the traditional fasting parameters without hurting yourself. It will be hard, you will suffer, but suck it up. Now, there are some who will claim that “people were holier back then we can’t handle these sort of fasts”. I call BS on this. It is true that if you’ve never done the traditional type of fast it’s a bit much to jump entirely into all at once, but at least use it as a goal to work up to. Besides, assuming it were true that people were holier in the past,  we have greater not lesser need of difficult penance than they did. Fasting can be done in creative ways as well, leaving cream and sugar out of your coffee or making your showers cold, for example. Take inventory of your life and figure out what you can do in the area of fasting. The one warning I will give is to not bite off too much initially but ease in, if you have a reliable confessor you may want to run it by him. I stress ‘reliable’ many priests are like other men of this age, soft. I would be selective in seeking advice, find a manly holy priest. Father limp-wrist will form you into a limp-wrist.
    3. Almsgiving; Give to the poor. This should be proportionate to your means, if you are gainfully employed then putting spange in the ‘rice-bowl’ doesn’t cut it. Generally speaking putting pennies in the rice bowl is for children (there are exceptions, the unemployed, elderly on limited income and so on). Give as you have received. This too might hurt a little for some of us. Do not neglect the spiritually poor as well. Offer up Masses, prayers and sacrifices for souls.
    4. Spiritual Reading; Really it probably belongs with prayer, but let’s break it out a little. I would encourage sound, solid, serious spiritual reading. Not mushy, sentimental stuff like ‘Guideposts’. Please, we have time tested works which are intended to help make us holy. Most, of this stuff is available digitally for free. I would particularly recommend ‘The Spiritual Combat’ by Scupoli. But writings of the dessert fathers and similar classic works are ideal for our purposes.

Ok, that’s pretty much it. Get real with yourself, be honest, stop making excuses. The spiritual life is one of struggle and combat. You will fall down, when that happens get back up. It will be difficult, so man up, and face it head on.


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Candlemas Day

Today is Candlemas day, the commemoration of the presentation of Jesus and purification of Mary in the temple. Candles are solemnly blessed on this feast.

I came across this poem.

If Candlemas be fair and bright,
Winter has another flight.
If Candlemas brings clouds and rain,
Winter will not come again.
English poem

Interesting, considering it is our Groundhog day with woodchucks predicting the weather by looking for their shadows.

Related image

Posted in Feast days | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Brigid’s Day

St. Brigid of Kildare, Pray for us.

Image result for st. brigid's cross

St. Brigid’s Cross

Posted in Feast days, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Buying Forgiveness

This begins the Protestant Mythology series.

Myth #1- “During the Middle Aged the Catholic Church purported to sell forgiveness for sins (indulgences).” Image result for selling indulgences

2017 is the 500 year anniversary of the Protestant Reformation. This post begins my 2017 series debunking the Protestant mythology. By mythology I mean a certain set of generally accepted ‘facts’ which are believed without hesitation, at least in the English speaking world. The truth behind the ‘facts’ is usually not so simple and straightforward of course. At this point many of these myths have become secularized and one can find them in textbooks of our secular public schools, they are part of a cultural imprint.

This first myth is one I consider a gimmie.

“During the Middle Ages The Catholic Church sold forgiveness for sins.”

This claim refers to the granting of indulgences and is expanded in a number of ways, some more accurate than others. Some of the more outrageous versions of this claim state that one could purchase indulgences for things like adultery ahead of time, in other words the elements of repentance and contrition weren’t necessary one could simply buy their way out of hell. According to this myth an indulgence was permission to indulge in sin. I consider busting this myth a gimmie because I need only explain what an indulgence is.

It is true that indulgences were granted for making donations to the church and that there were abuses of this practice to the point that one could say churchmen were selling indulgences. One may debate whether granting indulgences for donations is a good thing. One may debate and object to the theology of indulgences. In either case, for the sake of honesty one must actually, as a prerequisite, know what they are objecting to.

So, what is an indulgence? An indulgence is the remission of temporal punishment due to sin. It is not a remission of sin but of punishment. It is not a remission of eternal punishment. It is not a remission of guilt. It is most certainly not a permission to sin. CCC 1471

There… done.

The underlying theology is that of satisfaction for sins, and very much a development from the public penances of the early church. Additionally, the communion of the saints and the concept of bearing one another’s burdens is involved. Of course most of those who think an indulgence is remission of or permission to sin have no idea what temporal punishment is. Eternal punishment is Hell. Temporal punishment are the other negative fruits of sin due to the sinner. The classic biblical example is that of King David and his sin of Adultery in the old Testament. He repents and is forgiven but is told he still must suffer the punishment of his child dying as a result of his sin.

More could be said as this is a complex subject but the myth has been addressed, if you’re trying to get rid of sins and avoid hell, indulgences don’t even claim to help.

(For further reading see St. Thomas Aquinas part 3, questions 86-90: and questions 25-27 of the supplement to part 3 of the Summa. I doubt anyone will actually click the links though, but I included it for those who might claim the church changed the definition of ‘indulgence’ after the reformation.)

Posted in Protestant mythology, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments